Nevada Timeshare License Practice Exam

What law would be violated if Herbert was denied the opportunity to buy a timeshare due to his race?

1. Civil Rights Action of 1964

2. Civil Rights Act of 1871

3. Civil Rights Action of 1866

4. Civil Rights Amendment of 1965

The correct answer is: Civil Rights Action of 1866

The correct answer pertains to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which specifically addresses discrimination based on race in contracts and property rights. This law affirms that all persons, regardless of race, shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts, and thus, it directly applies to situations involving the sale or rental of property, including timeshares. If Herbert was denied the opportunity to buy a timeshare solely due to his race, this would constitute a violation of the rights established by this act. The other options, while also related to civil rights, do not specifically address the issue of property and contract rights in the same direct manner. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 focuses on broader areas of discrimination including employment and public accommodations, rather than specifically on property transactions. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 pertains mainly to the enforcement of civil rights and suits against state actors. The Civil Rights Amendment of 1965, which isn't accurately referenced, would generally relate to voting rights and not property rights. Thus, the violation in Herbert’s scenario clearly aligns with the protections outlined in the Civil Rights Act of 1866.